Skeptic tries to debunk Bigfoot film from 1967, fails miserably

Mr. Blevins thinks he have a perfect match

Leroy Blevins, where do we begin? Let's start with your costume. It sucks. Seriously, this is all you have to show us? You've mentioned about spending 250 bucks on this ugly costume. Please be honest, we think you spent more than that. Trying to mimic the muscle movement probably took a lot of time and money. People will laugh at you if you try running across the street with that fake looking costume. The video that came out a month ago taken by a North Carolina man shows a Bigfoot dragging his stupid costume across the road looks like a cheaper version of your costume. Not saying it was exactly like your costume, but you can tell from a mile away the costume is fake.

If you're trying to prove that Bigfoot does not exist, you have to try harder, because your sloppy analysis just looks silly. At the end of the video, you signed off with "Match". I think you're being delusional. There's no match here. We all want to be proven wrong, but you're going about it the wrong way. Next time, try to match the soft tissues like Patty's breasts. You might have a chance of proving us all wrong.

And please keep making these videos. It's very entertaining because your video analysis usually proves NOTHING!

Matt Moneymaker: The costume was so cheap [Byers] had to blur the image.

Read about the North Carolina Bigfoot here

Related Posts:

• Almost 45 years later, Bigfoot costumes still suck
• Bigfoot in Patterson-Gimlin footage had breasts [NSFW]